Most leadership teams believe they know how they are experienced by the people they lead. Most don't — not fully. The Effectful Leadership Assessment creates that picture.
Leadership challenges rarely come from bad intent. They come from a gap between how leaders think they lead — and how that leadership is actually experienced by the people around them.
Left unaddressed, that gap compounds: strategy drifts, priorities fragment, and trust erodes — until the cost has already been paid.
These are the patterns that emerge when organisations create space to listen honestly — across every level.
Both formats follow the same core process. Every interview is anonymised and confidential.
A structured sequence from preparation to aligned action — not observations, not recommendations, but agreed behavioural change with clear ownership and timing.
| Before | After ELA | |
|---|---|---|
| Strategy is discussed at the top. | → | Strategy shapes decisions at every level. |
| The leadership team aligns in the room. | → | Priorities are consistent outside it. |
| Issues surface when they have already escalated. | → | Issues are identified and addressed early. |
| Messages vary across levels and functions. | → | Leadership communication is coherent and consistent. |
| Middle managers interpret leadership direction. | → | Middle managers lead with clarity and confidence. |
Novo Nordisk has developed and worked with the NNWay Facilitation practice for 30+ years. All quotes reflect senior leaders' first-hand experience of the value of that practice. ELA is built on the same methodology — developed by Jan Christian Rasmussen from his 7+ years as a Senior NNWay Facilitator at Novo Nordisk.
ELA is most valuable when the timing is right — a new leadership team, a period of change, or a sense that something is not quite working as intended.
If you are uncertain whether ELA is relevant for your organisation right now — that uncertainty is usually the answer.